When SEN Support Isn’t Working_compressed

What to Do When SEN Support Is Not Working

How to Review What Has Been Tried, Identify What Is Missing and Decide What Should Happen Next

SEN Support should help a child make progress, reduce barriers to learning and improve their ability to access education.

But sometimes parents reach a point where support has been in place for months—or even years—and their child is still struggling.

You may be asking:

  • Why is nothing changing?
  • Is the current support actually being delivered?
  • Are the targets meaningful?
  • Has the school properly identified my child’s needs?
  • Should different reasonable adjustments be tried?
  • Is more specialist assessment needed?
  • Is the current level of SEN Support still enough?
  • Should we now be considering an EHCP?

If SEN Support does not appear to be working, the next step is not simply to repeat the same interventions.

The situation needs to be reviewed systematically.

Signs SEN Support May Not Be Working

Every child is different, but there are some common warning signs.

You may need to look more closely at the current support if:

  • your child is making little or no progress;
  • the same difficulties remain term after term;
  • the same targets keep appearing on the SEN Support plan;
  • interventions are repeated without clear evidence of impact;
  • school support is inconsistent;
  • support depends on which member of staff is available;
  • reasonable adjustments are not used consistently;
  • professional recommendations have not been implemented;
  • your child requires increasing levels of adult support;
  • anxiety about school is increasing;
  • emotional dysregulation is worsening;
  • attendance is deteriorating;
  • school avoidance is emerging;
  • your child is becoming more dependent rather than more independent;
  • your child is coping in school but significantly distressed at home;
  • or you repeatedly leave school meetings without clear next steps.

These issues do not automatically mean the school is failing.

But they do indicate that the current approach may need to be reviewed.

Start With Four Questions

A useful way to review SEN Support is to work through:

Need

What needs have actually been identified?

Provision

What support was supposed to be provided?

Delivery

Was that support actually delivered consistently?

Impact

What difference did it make?

This simple structure can reveal where the problem lies.

Have Your Child’s Needs Been Properly Identified?

Support cannot be effective if the school does not have a sufficiently clear understanding of the child’s needs.

For example, a child may be described as:

“Easily distracted.”

But the underlying issue could involve:

  • ADHD;
  • working-memory difficulties;
  • language-processing difficulties;
  • sensory overload;
  • anxiety;
  • executive-function difficulties;
  • inappropriate task level;
  • communication needs;
  • or a combination of factors.

Similarly, a child may be described as:

“Refusing to work.”

But that behaviour may reflect:

  • inability to understand the task;
  • demand anxiety;
  • literacy difficulties;
  • fear of failure;
  • sensory overload;
  • poor emotional regulation;
  • or difficulty initiating tasks independently.

The more accurately the barrier is understood, the more targeted the support can become.

Does the Provision Actually Match the Need?

It is possible for a child to receive a large amount of support that does not adequately address the actual difficulty.

For example:

Need

Difficulty retaining verbal instructions.

Support

General adult supervision.

That may not be enough.

A more targeted response might include:

  • chunked instructions;
  • visual prompts;
  • written reinforcement;
  • checking understanding;
  • reduced verbal load;
  • and processing time.

The key question is:

Does the provision directly address the identified barrier?

Is the Support Specific Enough?

Parents are often told that their child receives:

  • “adult support”;
  • “small group work”;
  • “regular check-ins”;
  • “access to a quiet area”;
  • “additional help when needed”.

Those may all be useful.

But if nobody can explain:

  • how often;
  • how long;
  • when;
  • who;
  • what for;
  • and with what intended outcome,

it becomes difficult to evaluate whether the support is sufficient.

Where provision is vague, one of the first steps is to ask for greater clarity.

Has the Support Actually Been Delivered?

This is crucial.

A SEN Support plan may look appropriate on paper, but implementation can be inconsistent.

Parents may discover that:

  • interventions have been cancelled;
  • teaching assistants have been moved elsewhere;
  • staff have changed;
  • some teachers know about the plan while others do not;
  • agreed adjustments are not used consistently;
  • the child is expected to request support they are not able to request independently;
  • or support only happens after the child reaches crisis point.

If support has not been delivered as planned, it is difficult to judge whether the intervention itself was ineffective.

Are the Outcomes Clear and Measurable?

A vague target such as:

“Improve confidence.”

does not make it easy to judge progress.

Similarly:

“Improve attention.”

may be too broad.

A more useful outcome should allow the school and parent to observe change.

For example:

“During independent written work, X will begin the task within two minutes using the agreed visual checklist and no more than one adult prompt in four out of five observed lessons.”

The purpose is not to make every target overly technical.

It is to make progress reviewable.

Has the Assess, Plan, Do, Review Cycle Actually Changed Anything?

The graduated approach should be iterative.

That means each cycle should build on what was learned previously.

A problematic cycle may look like:

Assess
Child still struggling.

Plan
Repeat same intervention.

Do
Same intervention again.

Review
Child still struggling.

Then repeat.

A more effective review should ask:

  • Why did the previous approach not work?
  • Was it delivered consistently?
  • Was the underlying need correctly identified?
  • Should the intervention change?
  • Should the intensity increase?
  • Are different reasonable adjustments needed?
  • Is further assessment required?
  • Does the child need specialist support?

Have Professional Recommendations Been Implemented?

If your child has reports from professionals, it is worth checking whether the recommendations have actually been reflected in school support.

This might include recommendations from:

  • an educational psychologist;
  • speech and language therapist;
  • occupational therapist;
  • autism assessment;
  • ADHD assessment;
  • dyslexia assessment;
  • specialist teacher;
  • CAMHS;
  • physiotherapy;
  • or another professional.

Ask:

Which recommendations are being used?

Where are they recorded?

Who is responsible for them?

How often are they being delivered?

How is their impact being reviewed?

A professional report does not automatically become school provision simply because it has been shared.

Reasonable Adjustments for Send Children_compressed

Have Reasonable Adjustments Been Fully Explored?

Sometimes the difficulty is not primarily the lack of an intervention.

The child may be struggling because the normal school environment or routines create barriers.

Depending on the child, adjustments might include:

  • visual timetables;
  • reduced verbal instructions;
  • extra processing time;
  • movement breaks;
  • sensory regulation opportunities;
  • quieter working areas;
  • reduced copying;
  • different methods of recording work;
  • transition support;
  • a named adult;
  • adjusted homework;
  • advance warning of changes;
  • support during lunch or break;
  • adapted attendance arrangements;
  • or other individual changes.

If the same intervention has been repeated without progress, it may be worth asking whether environmental or classroom adjustments have been overlooked.

Is the Child Becoming More Dependent on Adult Support?

This is an important issue.

A child may appear to be making progress because an adult is helping them constantly.

For example, the child may complete work because an adult:

  • repeats every instruction;
  • keeps them on task;
  • organises materials;
  • prompts each next step;
  • regulates emotions;
  • reassures them frequently;
  • or sits beside them throughout the task.

That support may be appropriate.

But the review should still identify:

How independently can the child function without that level of support?

The level of adult input required is itself important evidence.

What If School Says Your Child Is Making Progress?

Progress should be looked at carefully.

A child may be making academic progress while still experiencing significant difficulty in:

  • independence;
  • emotional regulation;
  • communication;
  • sensory tolerance;
  • attendance;
  • social interaction;
  • organisation;
  • executive functioning;
  • or anxiety.

Likewise, progress achieved only through very high levels of adult support may still indicate significant need.

A useful review considers:

Progress + Support Required + Sustainability

not progress in isolation.

When Home and School See Different Things

Parents sometimes hear:

“We do not see that at school.”

This can happen for several reasons.

Some children:

  • mask difficulties;
  • comply through anxiety;
  • hold themselves together during the day;
  • rely heavily on structure;
  • suppress sensory distress;
  • avoid asking for help;
  • or experience the consequences later at home.

Parents may see:

  • meltdowns;
  • shutdowns;
  • exhaustion;
  • sleep disruption;
  • refusal the following morning;
  • distress after school;
  • or inability to manage homework.

Home evidence should not automatically override school evidence.

But it should form part of the overall picture.

Unsure Whether Your Evidence Is Strong Enough for EOTAS_compressed

What If Attendance Is Getting Worse?

Increasing absence can be an important warning sign that current support is not addressing the child’s needs.

Look for patterns such as:

  • repeated lateness;
  • anxiety before school;
  • frequent physical symptoms;
  • distress on Sunday evenings;
  • difficulty returning after weekends or holidays;
  • partial attendance;
  • reduced timetables;
  • persistent absence;
  • refusal to enter school;
  • or complete school avoidance.

Where SEND may be contributing, the focus should not simply be:

“How do we improve attendance?”

It should also be:

Why has attendance become difficult?

Possible contributors may include:

  • sensory overload;
  • anxiety;
  • social difficulties;
  • academic pressure;
  • unmet learning needs;
  • demand avoidance;
  • bullying;
  • transition difficulties;
  • communication difficulties;
  • or placement mismatch.

What Should You Ask the SENCO?

If SEN Support is not working, useful questions include:

What needs has the school identified?

What evidence supports that assessment?

What provision has been delivered?

How consistently has it been delivered?

What outcomes were expected?

What evidence shows whether it worked?

Which professional recommendations have been implemented?

Which recommendations have not been implemented?

What reasonable adjustments are currently in place?

What has changed since the previous review?

Is further assessment needed?

Is specialist advice required?

Does the current SEN Support plan need rewriting?

What will be different in the next APDR cycle?

What will happen if the next cycle does not improve the situation?

When to Escalate the Issue

If repeated SEN Support cycles have not produced sufficient progress, escalation may be appropriate.

That could involve:

  • a formal SENCO review meeting;
  • a meeting with senior leadership;
  • further specialist assessment;
  • involvement of external professionals;
  • strengthening the SEN Support plan;
  • changing provision;
  • addressing attendance or placement concerns;
  • or considering whether an EHC needs assessment should be requested.

Escalation does not automatically mean conflict.

The aim should be to create a clearer evidence-based plan.

Could It Be Time to Consider an EHCP?

Many children can have their needs met through SEN Support.

However, an EHC needs assessment may need to be considered where:

  • the child’s needs are significant or complex;
  • repeated SEN Support cycles have not been sufficient;
  • substantial adult support is required;
  • specialist provision is needed;
  • progress remains limited;
  • attendance is deteriorating significantly;
  • placement is becoming unstable;
  • multiple professionals are involved;
  • or the provision required may need to be specified and coordinated through an EHCP.

The evidence gathered through SEN Support can be particularly important.

This includes:

  • SEN Support plans;
  • APDR records;
  • intervention records;
  • progress data;
  • professional reports;
  • attendance evidence;
  • parent evidence;
  • and records showing what has already been tried.

What If School Is Becoming Impossible to Access?

For some children, difficulties can progress beyond ineffective SEN Support into a more serious breakdown in access to education.

This might involve:

  • prolonged absence;
  • repeated failed returns;
  • severe anxiety;
  • sensory overload;
  • burnout;
  • reduced timetables that do not improve access;
  • placement breakdown;
  • or a child receiving little meaningful education.

Where a child has or may require an EHCP, this may raise wider questions about whether the current placement remains suitable and whether alternative provision needs to be considered.

For some families, this can eventually include exploring Education Otherwise Than At School (EOTAS).

How School of Diversity Can Help

If you are unsure why SEN Support is not working, our support can help you separate the issues.

We can review:

  • your child’s needs;
  • the current SEN Support plan;
  • APDR records;
  • interventions;
  • reasonable adjustments;
  • professional recommendations;
  • school reports;
  • attendance information;
  • and relevant parent evidence.

We then help identify:

  • what appears to be working;
  • what is unclear;
  • what may be missing;
  • what questions should be asked;
  • what further evidence may be useful;
  • and what should happen next.

SEND Action Plan

If you want a structured review of the current support, our SEND Action Plan can help.

This can include:

  • review of relevant school records;
  • review of SEN Support and APDR;
  • identification of unmet or unclear needs;
  • review of provision;
  • reasonable adjustment recommendations;
  • questions for school;
  • evidence priorities;
  • and a written next-step plan.

SEND Action Plan — £195

SENCO Meeting Support

If the next step is a school meeting, we can also help you prepare.

This can include:

  • identifying priorities;
  • reviewing evidence;
  • preparing questions;
  • deciding what outcomes to ask for;
  • and preparing an action sheet for the meeting.
Frequently Asked Questions Diversity Support_compressed

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should I wait before deciding SEN Support is not working?

There is no single fixed timeframe.

The key question is whether the support has been delivered for long enough to evaluate its impact and whether the child is making sufficient progress.

If difficulties are worsening, it may not be appropriate to wait for another routine review.

What if the school keeps using the same intervention?

Ask what evidence shows that the intervention is working and what will change if progress remains limited.

Repeated use of the same approach without meaningful impact should prompt review.

What if support is written in the plan but not delivered?

Raise this with the SENCO and ask for clarification about what has been delivered, when, by whom and how consistently.

Can I ask the school to change the SEN Support plan?

Yes.

Parents can raise concerns about whether the plan accurately reflects needs, provision, outcomes and current evidence.

Does SEN Support have to fail before I can request an EHCP?

No.

There is no requirement that every possible school intervention must fail before an EHC needs assessment can be requested.

The relevant question is whether an assessment may be necessary to determine the special educational provision required.

What if school and home disagree about my child’s needs?

Ask for both perspectives to be recorded and considered alongside objective evidence, professional reports, progress data and the level of support required.

Can School of Diversity review the current SEN Support?

Yes.

Our SEND Action Plan can review the agreed school and professional evidence and identify possible gaps, questions and next steps.